If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
https://canvas.instructure.com/eportfolios/1962270/Home/Shield_Yourself_From_Electromagnetic_Fields_By_Wearing_Certain_Clothes are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
Proteck'd Emf Apparel overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for how to block emf with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.